28280/2008
MULTIMEMBER COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THESSALONIKI

The Multimember Court of First Instance of Thessaloniki judges the application for interim measures only during the discussion of the main case. If the application for interim measures is brought to discussion to the Multimember Court before the discussion of the suspending main case, its discussion is declared as inadmissible, aiming at its co-judgment with the main case. Inadmissible discussion of the application under judgment.

12069/2013
MULTIMEMBER COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THESSALONIKI 

Preparation of oral loan contract with General Partnership. Condition in the articles of association: that the company will be committed and assume validly obligations, when both partners sign under the corporate name. Between General Partnership and General Partnereship partners, there is mandatory class action, while between the General Partnership partners in the same trial, there is no mandatory class action, there is simple class action. The written or oral confession by the litigant party constitutes integrated evidence against the person who confessed. The judicial confession by one of the simple joint defendants is not binding for the other joint defendants. The Court estimates freely the confession to all the mandatory joint defendants.

24664/2011
SINGLE MEMBER COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THESSALONIKI

Preparation of oral loan contract with General Partnership. Condition in the articles of association: that the company will be committed and assume validly obligations, when both partners sign under the corporate name. Between General Partnership and General Partnership partners, there is mandatory class action, while between the General Partnership partners in the same trial, there is no mandatory class action, there is simple class action. Approval of action. In case of more joint defendants, the approval of action is judged independently for each joint defendant, that is, objectively both in simple and mandatory class action. (76 par. 2), with the exception as for the latter case, when the claim for disposal of the recognized right belongs jointly to all the mandatory joint defendants and when it is a mandatory joint legitimization, therefore the declaration of approval should result by all the joint defendants.